Klaus D. Goepel, BPMSG, Contact, last update: Sep 4, 2017
386 thoughts on “Feedback”
After completing a pairwise comparison for criteria, I press consolidated results so that I can move on to comparing alternatives to criteria.
In order to get a link for the participants, I have to leave group mode. I copy and e-mail the link but when the participants get the link the section for them to enter their name has my name in it and is grayed out and won’t accept any input.
What are the steps I should be taking to move from a completed critreeria evaluation to an evaluation of alternatives via group mode and a link.
I have read the user guide but still stymied.
Dear Pat,
if you use the link on the same computer with the same browser, it remembers your session and your name will be filled out automatically and grayed.
Try to logout first, close and reopen the browser and open the link for the participants. It should work then.
Thanks for you great effort for developing this tool. Its very user-friendly.
I have 2 questions:
1- as far as i know, I can use this tool to reach a decision between 2 (or more alternatives) based on the available criteria. Using the template, I reached a ranking for each criterion, but not a ranking for the alternatives (participants). Am I missing something?
2- This work is to be published, how can i reference your template?
1. the Excel template does not include alternative evaluation. It’s available in my free online software.
2. reference as given here: http://bpmsg.com/isahp_2013-13-03-13-goepel/
After completing a pairwise comparison for criteria, I press consolidated results so that I can move on to comparing alternatives to criteria.
In order to get a link for the participants, I have to leave group mode. I copy and e-mail the link but when the participants get the link the section for them to enter their name has my name in it and is grayed out and won’t accept any input.
What are the steps I should be taking to move from a completed critreeria evaluation to an evaluation of alternatives via group mode and a link.
I have read the user guide but still stymied.
Thank you.
Dear Pat,
if you use the link on the same computer with the same browser, it remembers your session and your name will be filled out automatically and grayed.
Try to logout first, close and reopen the browser and open the link for the participants. It should work then.
If I would like to create more than 10 inputs and 20 respondants, please recommend me to create excel for ahp. Thank you so much.
Thank you! Very useful for my uni project!
Hello,
I have a question. How to understand CR result in AHP?
in my case, CR is 45%. Is it good or bad result? in other word, Is it consistency or inconsistency?
Rule of thumb is that CR should be less than 10%.
Please see more in my post here:
http://bpmsg.com/ahp-high-consistency-ratio/
Dear Klaus,
Thanks for you great effort for developing this tool. Its very user-friendly.
I have 2 questions:
1- as far as i know, I can use this tool to reach a decision between 2 (or more alternatives) based on the available criteria. Using the template, I reached a ranking for each criterion, but not a ranking for the alternatives (participants). Am I missing something?
2- This work is to be published, how can i reference your template?
Thank you!
Dear Ibtihal,
1. the Excel template does not include alternative evaluation. It’s available in my free online software.
2. reference as given here: http://bpmsg.com/isahp_2013-13-03-13-goepel/
regards, Klaus
Como devo fazer a referência do uso desta ferramenta no meu trabalho?
Please use the reference here: http://bpmsg.com/isahp_2013-13-03-13-goepel/
Olá bom dia,
o peso atribuído a cada critério se encontra na última linha do arquivo excel?
You will find the calculated weights on the excel summary sheet.
This is great work. The simplest tool that I have seen on internet yet
Thank you sir…This template helped me lot to do my project work….
Hello
That was an excellent template. It helps understand the concept very well. Thank you very much.